Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro

Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro
$519
100 mm
autofocus prime lens
f/2.8
  • Canon USM Built in focus motor
  • 1:1 (1x) Macro

reviewswhat are people saying

starstarstarstarstar
B&H Photo Video

Rated 5 out of 5 stars by 443 users at B&H Photo Video

"I was hesitant at first, but after using this lens, I am amazed. For my first macro, I love it! For the money I paid for it, couldn't possibly do any better. Lightweight and fast."

"This lens is super fast and silent while focusing, but more importantly accurate as well. It is unbelievably sharp a few stops under wide open."

"The lens is slightly on the heavy side so I would recommend the collar for the tripod mount to correctly balance the camera during use (more than likely my next purchase)."

compatibilitywith digital cameras

Full frame

This lens is compatible with Full frame cameras such as the Canon 6D, Canon 5D Mark III and Canon 1D X.

Canon EOS 6D
20.4°
horizontal angle of view
100mm
35mm equivalent focal length

APS-C (1.6x crop factor)

This lens is compatible with APS-C (1.6x crop factor) cameras such as the Canon T3i, Canon 60D and Canon T4i.

Canon Rebel T3i
12.7°
horizontal angle of view
161.5mm
35mm equivalent focal length

Pros

The Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro vs other Canon EF (Full-frame) lenses

Prime lens Prime lens Help
Typically very sharp
Magnification Great macro Help
1:1 (1x)
Auto focus Supports autofocus Help
Easier to use
Lowest price Inexpensive Help
$519.00
Wide maximum High max f/stop Help
f/32

The Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro vs other Canon EF (Full-frame) macro lenses

Focus motor Silent focus motor Help
Silent and fast

Cons

The Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro vs other Canon EF (Full-frame) lenses

Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
Risk of blur

Specifications

General

Min focal length
Help
100 mm
Max focal length
Help
100 mm
Zoom range
Help
1x
below average below average
Magnification
Help
1:1 (1x)
unique unique

Aperture

Wide minimum
Help
f/2.8
Wide maximum
Help
f/32
above average above average
Tele minimum
Help
f/2.8
above average above average
Tele maximum
Help
f/32
above average above average

Features

Auto focus
Help
Yes
Focus motor
Help
Canon USM
above average above average
Image stabilization
Help
None
Fisheye
Help
No
Tilt-shift
Help
No

Form factor

Lens mount
Help
Canon EF (Full-frame)
Length
Help
119 mm
Diameter
Help
79 mm
Filter size
Help
58 mm
Weight
Help
0.6 kg

Angle of view

Wide horizontal
Help
20.4°
below average below average
Telephoto horizontal
Help
20.4°
Wide vertical
Help
13.7°
below average below average
Telephoto vertical
Help
13.7°
Wide diagonal
Help
24.4°
below average below average
Telephoto diagonal
Help
24.4°

Angle of view (On Canon EF-S APS-C 1.5x crop cameras)

Wide horizontal
Help
13.5°
below average below average
Telephoto horizontal
Help
13.5°
above average above average
Wide vertical
Help
below average below average
Telephoto vertical
Help
Wide diagonal
Help
16.2°
below average below average
Telephoto diagonal
Help
16.2°
above average above average

DiscussionWhat do you think about the Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro lens?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss the your opinion of this lens here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 3 comments

ISC (3:32 PM, December 19, 2010)
Hi Aizuddin,

A very important thing to understand about lenses is that the "big number" you see isn't "how big" the lens is, but its "focal length" which can be overly simplified as describing how much zoom or magnification this lens provides. There are always trade offs though, because the "shorter the lens" (the smaller the focal length) the more distortion from the lens (so if you look at really wide angle lenses such as "fish eye" lenses you will see that taking pictures of people results in clown faces where there nose is huge).

However, you are still correct about these two lenses being different sizes. One has a 52mm "filter size" while the other is 58mm, which affects how big the lens is in diameter and will affect what filters you can screw onto the front.

Finally, there is one last super important detail about these two lenses that make them really different. One is has a EF camera mount (the 100mm one) while the other has a EF-S camera mount (the 60mm one). The EF-S mount will only mount onto the newer Canon digital cameras, while the EF mount will allow you to use this lens on both the new Canon digital cameras, as well as older digital and film cameras from Canon. So for my Canon 10D, I would have to choose the 100mm, as my camera doesn't support the EF-S mount, but if you had a Canon 20D, then you could choose either one.
 
Avatar for lenshero lenshero (2:15 PM, December 17, 2010)
Hi Aizuddin, the size of the image won't be impacted, the size of the subject you taking a picture of is limited by the magnification, and both this lens and the 60mm Canon macro lens have 1:1 magnification.

So what is the difference then?

1. The pictures with have a different perspective. E.g. if you take a picture of a building at a wide angle focal length (say 20mm) the lines on the building won't be straight, whereas at 200mm they would be. So there will be some subtle difference in perspective at 60mm vs 100mm, this means you subject will look slightly different. Longer focal lengths distort less, so the 100mm might be slightly more pleasing to the eye.

2. If you keep the aperture the same, you'll have a narrower depth of field with the 100mm lens than the 60mm lens. Usually this creates a nice effect of blurring the background, but when taking macro shots my experience has been that you want the widest possible depth of field to ensure you subject (say a flower or insect) is completely in focus.

Again, this won't be a big difference, both are fairly long focal lengths, and will both have TINY depths of field when taking close up pictures.
 
Avatar for Aizuddin Danian Aizuddin Danian (5:57 AM, December 17, 2010)
Newbie question, sorry. What's the difference between 100mm and 60mm? I notice that Canon has virtually the same macro lense but comes in these two size variants. What's the impact of the size on the photo? Thanks fellas for the feedback.