vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Zeiss 35mm f/2 ZM Biogon T* Leica-m

Narrower aperture f/22 vs f/16
Help
At its narrowest, the 35mm f/2 ZM Biogon T* Leica-m goes 0.9 f-stops narrower
Wider aperture f/2 vs f/2.5
Help
At its widest, the 35mm f/2 ZM Biogon T* Leica-m captures slightly more light, 0.6 f-stops
Cheaper $948.00 vs $1,895.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $947 cheaper (around 50% less)
Zeiss 35mm f/2 ZM Biogon T* Leica-m Learn more about
the Zeiss 35mm f/2 ZM Biogon T* Leica-m

Reasons to consider the Leica 35mm f/2.5

LensHero is not aware of any important advantages of the Leica 35mm f/2.5 vs the Zeiss 35mm f/2 ZM Biogon T* Leica-m.
Leica Summarit 35mm f/2.5 Learn more about
the Leica 35mm f/2.5

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Prime lens Fixed focal length prime lenses Help
Typically very sharp
Aperture Wide aperture Help
35mm f/2 ZM Biogon T* Leica-m:f/2
35mm f/2.5 :f/2.5
Auto focus Auto focus Help
Focus yourself
Focus motor No silent focus motor Help
Louder and slower
Max focal length Poor telephoto Help
35 mm
Zoom range Poor zoom Help
1x

Compared to low light lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

LensHero is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

LensHero is not aware of any interesting weaknesses shared by these two products.

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Leica Summilux 35mm f/1.4

Leica Summilux 35mm f/1.4

Low light lens

$5,150

Aperture Has a wider aperture
Auto focus Has autofocus
Lowest price Is significantly more expensive
Fujifilm 35mm f/1.4 XF R

Fujifilm 35mm f/1.4 XF R

Low light lens

Aperture Has a wider aperture
Auto focus Has autofocus
Rokinon 8mm f/2.8 Samsung-nx

Rokinon 8mm f/2.8 Samsung-nx

Fisheye lens

$349

Fisheye Is a fisheye lens
Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Leica Summicron 35mm f/2 M

Leica Summicron 35mm f/2 M

Low light lens

$3,195

Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
Leica Summicron  28mm f/2

Leica Summicron 28mm f/2

Low light lens

$4,295

Lowest price Is significantly more expensive
Nikon Nikkor  35mm f/1.4 AIS

Nikon Nikkor 35mm f/1.4 AIS

Low light lens

$799

Aperture Has a wider aperture
Fujifilm 60mm f/2.4 XF Macro

Fujifilm 60mm f/2.4 XF Macro

Macro lens

$649

Magnification Has better macro
Auto focus Has autofocus

Zeiss 35mm f/2 ZM Biogon T* Leica-m Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Zeiss Distagon  T* 25mm f/2 ZF.2 Nikon-f

Zeiss Distagon T* 25mm f/2 ZF.2 Nikon-f

Low light lens

$1,699

Magnification Significantly more magnification
Lowest price More expensive
Weight Slightly heavier
Zeiss Distagon 28mm f/2 T* Canon-ef

Zeiss Distagon 28mm f/2 T* Canon-ef

Low light lens

$1,283

Magnification More magnification
Weight Slightly heavier
Lowest price Slightly more expensive
Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 ZK Planar T* Pentax-k

Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 ZK Planar T* Pentax-k

Sports lens

$1,228

Aperture Wider aperture
Max focal length Better telephoto
Wide maximum Wider aperture
Min focal length Worse wide angle

Leica Summarit 35mm f/2.5 Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Zeiss 35mm f/2.8 C Biogon T* ZM Leica-m

Zeiss 35mm f/2.8 C Biogon T* ZM Leica-m

Lens

$860

Wide maximum Narrower aperture
Lowest price Cheaper
Aperture Slightly narrower aperture
Length Slightly longer
Zeiss 50mm f/1.5 ZM Leica-m

Zeiss 50mm f/1.5 ZM Leica-m

Low light lens

$1,200

Aperture Wider aperture
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Min focal length Slightly worse wide angle
Length Slightly longer
Sony 24mm f/1.8 E-Mount Carl Zeiss Sonnar

Sony 24mm f/1.8 E-Mount Carl Zeiss Sonnar

Low light lens

$1,098

Auto focus Auto focus
Aperture Wider aperture

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments