differences

Reasons to consider the Tokina 17-35mm f/4 Pro FX Canon EF

Slightly cheaper $449.00 vs $749.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $300 cheaper (more than 40% less)
Placeholder Learn more about
the Tokina 17-35mm f/4 Pro FX Canon EF

Reasons to consider the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Slightly smaller diameter 84 mm vs 89 mm
Help
Around 10% smaller lens at the end
Slightly lighter 475 g vs 0.6 kg
Help
More than 20% lighter
Slightly more zoom 2.4x vs 2.1x
Help
More than 10% more zoom, giving you more flexibility for photos
Placeholder Learn more about
the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

similarities

Compared to digital camera lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Fixed aperture Constant aperture lenses Help
The same maximum aperture at all focal lengths
Auto focus Auto focus Help
Easier to use
Prime lens Both are zoom lenses Help
Typically not as sharp as prime lenses
Aperture Very narrow widest aperture size Help
f/4
Max focal length Poor telephoto Help
17-35mm f/4 Pro FX Canon EF35 mm
EF 17-40mm f/4L USM40 mm

Compared to digital camera lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Wide minimum Wide aperture Help
f/22
Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
Risk of blur

competitors

Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM Competitors

Placeholder

Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 USM

Wide angle lens

$539

Prime lens Is a prime lens
Aperture Wider aperture
Zoom range Less zoom
Placeholder

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM

Wide angle lens

$799

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Aperture Wider aperture
Length Slightly longer
Placeholder

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

Telephoto lens

$599

Wide minimum Significantly narrower aperture
Max focal length Better telephoto
Length Longer

Tokina 17-35mm f/4 Pro FX Canon EF Competitors

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments