differences

Reasons to consider the Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Canon EF

Has a constant aperture Yes vs No
Help
Constant aperture lenses offer the same maximum aperture at all focal lengths
Significantly narrower aperture f/32 vs f/22
Help
At its narrowest, the SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Canon EF goes 1.1 f-stops narrower
Wider aperture f/2.8 vs f/4
Help
At its widest, the SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Canon EF captures slightly more light (1 f-stop)
Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Canon EF Learn more about
the Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Canon EF

Reasons to consider the Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II

Better image stabilization Canon IS II vs Tamron VC
Help
Less risk of blur
Shorter 108 mm vs 188 mm
Help
More than 40% shorter
Lighter 390 g vs 1.5 kg
Help
3.8x lighter
Has a silent focus motor Generic motor vs Tamron USD
Help
Focuses quickly and silently
Smaller diameter 70 mm vs 86 mm
Help
Around 20% smaller lens at the end
Cheaper $138.99 vs $1,008.95
Help
The best price we've seen is $870 cheaper (7.3x less)
More zoom 4.5x vs 2.9x
Help
Around 60% more zoom, giving you more flexibility for photos
Better telephoto 250 mm vs 200 mm
Help
Around 30% more reach, less perspective distortion
Slightly better wide angle 55 mm vs 70 mm
Help
More than 20% better wide angle
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II Learn more about
the Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II

similarities

Compared to digital camera lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Image stabilization Good image stabilization Help
SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Canon EFTamron VC
EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS IICanon IS II
Max focal length Good telephoto Help
SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Canon EF200 mm
EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II250 mm
Auto focus Auto focus Help
Easier to use
Prime lens Both are zoom lenses Help
Typically not as sharp as prime lenses

Compared to digital camera lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Min focal length Good wide-angle Help
SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Canon EF70 mm
EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II55 mm

LensHero is not aware of any interesting weaknesses shared by these two products.

competitors

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS II Competitors

Sony E 55-210mm f/4.5-6.3 OSS E-Mount

Sony E 55-210mm f/4.5-6.3 OSS E-Mount

Wildlife lens

$189 - $348

Diameter Slightly smaller diameter
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III

Wildlife lens

$89 - $199

Wide minimum Significantly narrower aperture
Max focal length Better telephoto
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED

Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED

Wildlife lens

$169

Length Slightly shorter
Wide minimum Much wider aperture

Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Canon EF Competitors

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG APO OS HSM

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG APO OS HSM

Macro lens

$2,000

Focus motor Has a silent focus motor
Wide minimum Significantly wider aperture
Tamron 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II PZD MACRO Sony Alpha

Tamron 16-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II PZD MACRO Sony Alpha

Travel lens

$629

Zoom range Much more zoom
Length Shorter
Fixed aperture Has a variable aperture
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

Telephoto lens

$520 - $526

Focus motor Has a silent focus motor
Weight Lighter
Image stabilization No image stabilization

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments