Tamron70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD Macro Nikon F vs Nikon NikkorAF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II
differences
|
similarities
Compared to digital camera lenses
Common Strengths | Common Weaknesses | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Compared to digital camera lenses
Common Strengths | Common Weaknesses | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
| LensHero is not aware of any interesting weaknesses shared by these two products. |
competitors
Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD Macro Nikon F Competitors

Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM Nikon F
Low light lens
$1,086 - $1,199
![]() | Is a prime lens |
![]() | Significantly shorter |
![]() | Much wider aperture |

Tamron SP 70-200mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Nikon F
Sports lens
$1,107 - $1,299
![]() | Image stabilization |
![]() | Slightly smaller diameter |
![]() | Doesn't have a silent focus motor |

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM
Sports lens
$1,460 - $1,799
![]() | Image stabilization |
![]() | More expensive |
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Competitors

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM
Sports lens
$1,460 - $1,799
![]() | Cheaper |
![]() | Slightly more magnification |

Nikon Nikkor AF 80-200mm f/2.8D ED
Sports lens
$1,222
![]() | Cheaper |
![]() | Slightly shorter |
![]() | Doesn't have a silent focus motor |

Nikon Nikkor DC 135mm f/2D
Sports lens
$1,102 - $1,392
![]() | Is a prime lens |
![]() | Shorter |
![]() | Doesn't have a silent focus motor |
discussion Which do you think is better?
Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.
Showing 0 comments