vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Canon-ef

Much more zoom 15x vs 4.3x
Help
More than 3.5x more zoom, giving you more flexibility for photos
Better wide angle 18 mm vs 70 mm
Help
3.9x better wide angle
Shorter 96 mm vs 142 mm
Help
More than 30% shorter
Wider aperture f/3.5 vs f/4
Help
At its widest, the 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Canon-ef captures marginally more light, 0.4 f-stops
Slightly lighter 450 g vs 0.6 kg
Help
Around 30% lighter
Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Canon-ef Learn more about
the Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Canon-ef

Reasons to consider the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

Significantly narrower aperture f/32 vs f/22
Help
At its narrowest, the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM goes 1.1 f-stops narrower
Better image stabilization Canon IS vs Tamron VC
Help
Less risk of blur
Slightly better telephoto 300 mm vs 270 mm
Help
More than 10% more reach, less perspective distortion
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Learn more about
the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Focus motor Silent focus motor Help
18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Canon-ef:Tamron PZD
EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM:Canon USM
Image stabilization Good image stabilization Help
18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Canon-ef:Tamron VC
EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM:Canon IS
Max focal length Good telephoto Help
18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Canon-ef:270 mm
EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM:300 mm
Prime lens Both are zoom lenses Help
Typically not as sharp as prime lenses
Fixed aperture Both are variable aperture lenses Help
Narrower aperture at longer focal lengths

Compared to wildlife lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Weight Light weight Help
18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Canon-ef:450 g
EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM:0.6 kg
Min focal length Good wide-angle Help
18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Canon-ef:18 mm
EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM:70 mm
Lowest price Inexpensive Help
$649.00
Length Short Help
18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Canon-ef:96 mm
EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM:142 mm

LensHero is not aware of any interesting weaknesses shared by these two products.

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Travel lens

$699

Focus motor Lacks a silent focus motor
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

Wildlife lens

$299

Focus motor Lacks a silent focus motor
Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Canon-ef

Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Canon-ef

Wildlife lens

$449

Min focal length Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
Focus motor Lacks a silent focus motor
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Travel lens

$499 - $549

Max focal length Has a slightly longer telephoto lens
Focus motor Lacks a silent focus motor
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

Telephoto lens

$629

Fixed aperture Has a fixed aperture
Min focal length Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
Image stabilization Doesn't have image stabilization
Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Travel lens

$479

Max focal length Has a slightly longer telephoto lens
Tamron 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di VC Canon-ef

Tamron 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di VC Canon-ef

Travel lens

$600

Focus motor Lacks a silent focus motor

Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Canon-ef Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Canon-ef

Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Canon-ef

Travel lens

$479

Magnification Slightly more magnification
Zoom range Less zoom
Weight Slightly heavier
Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Canon-ef

Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Canon-ef

Travel lens

$399

Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Zoom range Less zoom
Max focal length Slightly worse telephoto
Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 II DC OS HSM Canon-ef

Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 II DC OS HSM Canon-ef

Travel lens

$349

Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Zoom range Significantly less zoom
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Nikon-f

Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Nikon-f

Travel lens

$329

Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Magnification Slightly more magnification
Zoom range Less zoom
Weight Slightly heavier

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM

Canon 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM

Wildlife lens

$169

Length Slightly shorter
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG OS Canon-ef

Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG OS Canon-ef

Wildlife lens

$259

Length Slightly shorter
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Wide maximum Much wider aperture
Focus motor Doesn't have a silent focus motor
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

Telephoto lens

$1,149

Fixed aperture Has a consant aperture
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Zoom range Less zoom

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments