differences

Reasons to consider the Sony Sonnar T* FE 35mm f/2.8 ZA

Narrower aperture f/22 vs f/16
Help
At its narrowest, the Sonnar T* FE 35mm f/2.8 ZA goes 0.9 f-stops narrower
Shorter 37 mm vs 94 mm
Help
2.5x shorter
Smaller diameter 62 mm vs 77 mm
Help
Around 20% smaller lens at the end
Lighter 120 g vs 0.7 kg
Help
5.5x lighter
Slightly cheaper $659.00 vs $894.99
Help
The best price we've seen is $236 cheaper (around 30% less)
Sony Sonnar T* FE 35mm f/2.8 ZA Learn more about
the Sony Sonnar T* FE 35mm f/2.8 ZA

Reasons to consider the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Sony Alpha

Significantly wider aperture f/1.4 vs f/2.8
Help
At its widest, the 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Sony Alpha captures much more light (2 f-stops)
Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Sony Alpha Learn more about
the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Sony Alpha

similarities

Compared to digital camera lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Prime lens Fixed focal length prime lenses Help
Typically very sharp
Auto focus Auto focus Help
Easier to use
Max focal length Poor telephoto Help
35 mm

competitors

Sony Sonnar T* FE 35mm f/2.8 ZA Competitors

Zeiss Batis 25mm f/2 Sony E Full Frame

Zeiss Batis 25mm f/2 Sony E Full Frame

Low light lens

$1,099 - $1,299

Aperture Wider aperture
Min focal length Slightly better wide angle
Diameter Larger diameter
Sony FE 28mm f/2

Sony FE 28mm f/2

Low light lens

$248 - $448

Aperture Wider aperture
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Length Slightly longer
Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM

Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM

Low light lens

$549

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Aperture Wider aperture
Diameter Larger diameter

Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Sony Alpha Competitors

Zeiss Touit 32mm f/1.8 Sony E

Zeiss Touit 32mm f/1.8 Sony E

Low light lens

$670

Wide minimum Narrower aperture
Diameter Smaller diameter
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments