vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Sony 2 55-200mm f/4-5.6 DT

Much narrower aperture f/32 vs f/5.6
Help
At its narrowest, the 2 55-200mm f/4-5.6 DT goes 5 f-stops narrower
Slightly more magnification 1:3.4 (0.3x) vs 1:4.5 (0.2x)
Help
Take macro shots with subjects more than 30% larger in your photo
Slightly shorter 85 mm vs 102 mm
Help
Around 20% shorter
Sony 2 55-200mm f/4-5.6 DT Learn more about
the Sony 2 55-200mm f/4-5.6 DT

Reasons to consider the Sigma 50-200mm f/4-5.6 DC OS HSM Sony-alpha

Has a silent focus motor Sigma HSM vs None
Help
Focuses quickly and silently
Image stabilization Sigma OS vs None
Help
Helps eliminate blur caused by small camera movements
Slightly more zoom 4x vs 3.6x
Help
More than 10% more zoom, giving you more flexibility for photos
Sigma 50-200mm f/4-5.6 DC OS HSM Sony-alpha Learn more about
the Sigma 50-200mm f/4-5.6 DC OS HSM Sony-alpha

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

LensHero is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

Prime lens Both are zoom lenses Help
Typically not as sharp as prime lenses
Aperture Very narrow widest aperture size Help
f/4
Fixed aperture Both are variable aperture lenses Help
Narrower aperture at longer focal lengths

Compared to wildlife lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Length Short Help
2 55-200mm f/4-5.6 DT:85 mm
50-200mm f/4-5.6 DC OS HSM Sony-alpha:102 mm
Lowest price Inexpensive Help
2 55-200mm f/4-5.6 DT:$199.99
50-200mm f/4-5.6 DC OS HSM Sony-alpha:$159.00
Min focal length Good wide-angle Help
2 55-200mm f/4-5.6 DT:55 mm
50-200mm f/4-5.6 DC OS HSM Sony-alpha:50 mm
Max focal length Poor telephoto Help
200 mm

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Sony D 75-300mm f/4.5-5.6

Sony D 75-300mm f/4.5-5.6

Wildlife lens

$248

Max focal length Has a slightly shorter telephoto lens
Sony DT 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3

Sony DT 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3

Travel lens

$648

Zoom range Has way more large zoom range
Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Sony-alpha

Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Sony-alpha

Macro lens

$199

Max focal length Has a slightly shorter telephoto lens
Magnification Has better macro
Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Sony-alpha

Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Sony-alpha

Macro lens

$199

Max focal length Has a slightly shorter telephoto lens
Magnification Has better macro
Sony 55-210mm f/4.5-6.3mm

Sony 55-210mm f/4.5-6.3mm

Wide angle lens

$350

Max focal length Has a significantly longer telephoto lens
Zoom range Has slightly smaller zoom range
Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Sony-alpha

Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Sony-alpha

Travel lens

$249

Zoom range Has way more large zoom range
Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Sony-alpha

Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Sony-alpha

Travel lens

$479

Zoom range Has way more large zoom range

Sony 2 55-200mm f/4-5.6 DT Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Nikon Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED AF-S DX

Nikon Nikkor 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED AF-S DX

Wildlife lens

$180

Focus motor Has a silent focus motor
Wide maximum Significantly wider aperture
Sony 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS

Sony 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 OSS

Travel lens

$848

Zoom range Much more zoom
Aperture Wider aperture
Lowest price Slightly more expensive

Sigma 50-200mm f/4-5.6 DC OS HSM Sony-alpha Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Sony DT 35mm f/1.8 SAM

Sony DT 35mm f/1.8 SAM

Low light lens

$218

Wide maximum Much narrower aperture
Aperture Much wider aperture
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II PZD VC Sony-alpha

Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II PZD VC Sony-alpha

Travel lens

$449

Zoom range Much more zoom
Aperture Wider aperture
Lowest price Slightly more expensive

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments