vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon-f

More magnification 1:2 (0.5x) vs 1:4 (0.2x)
Help
Take macro shots with subjects 2x larger in your photo
Better telephoto 300 mm vs 200 mm
Help
50% more reach, less perspective distortion
Slightly more zoom 4.3x vs 3.6x
Help
Around 20% more zoom, giving you more flexibility for photos
Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon-f Learn more about
the Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon-f

Reasons to consider the Nikon AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED

Image stabilization Nikon VR vs None
Help
Helps eliminate blur caused by small camera movements
Has a silent focus motor Nikon AF-S vs None
Help
Focuses quickly and silently
Slightly shorter 100 mm vs 119 mm
Help
Around 20% shorter
Slightly lighter 335 g vs 0.6 kg
Help
More than 40% lighter
Slightly better wide angle 55 mm vs 70 mm
Help
More than 20% better wide angle
Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED Learn more about
the Nikon AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

LensHero is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

Prime lens Both are zoom lenses Help
Typically not as sharp as prime lenses
Aperture Very narrow widest aperture size Help
f/4
Fixed aperture Both are variable aperture lenses Help
Narrower aperture at longer focal lengths

Compared to wildlife lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Lowest price Inexpensive Help
70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon-f:$199.00
AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED:$224.15
Weight Light weight Help
70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon-f:0.6 kg
AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED:335 g
Length Short Help
70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon-f:119 mm
AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED:100 mm
Min focal length Good wide-angle Help
70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon-f:70 mm
AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED:55 mm

LensHero is not aware of any interesting weaknesses shared by these two products.

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR

Wildlife lens

$397

Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Nikon-f

Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Nikon-f

Macro lens

$199

Nikon Nikkor AF-S VR 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED

Nikon Nikkor AF-S VR 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED

Wildlife lens

$587

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

Wildlife lens

$299

Nikon Nikkor  70-300mm f/4-5.6G

Nikon Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6G

Wildlife lens

$150

Wide maximum Has a higher max f/stop
Sigma 50-200mm f/4-5.6 DC OS HSM Nikon-f

Sigma 50-200mm f/4-5.6 DC OS HSM Nikon-f

Wildlife lens

$159

Wide maximum Has a lower max f/stop
Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro Nikon-f

Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro Nikon-f

Macro lens

$159

Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon-f Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR

Travel lens

$1,047

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Zoom range Much more zoom
Lowest price More expensive
Weight Slightly heavier

Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Nikon Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR AF-S DX

Nikon Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR AF-S DX

Travel lens

$330

Zoom range More zoom
Aperture Wider aperture
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Magnification Slightly less magnification
Nikon Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR AF-S DX

Nikon Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G VR AF-S DX

Wide angle lens

$95 - $197

Aperture Wider aperture
Min focal length Better wide angle
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Zoom range Slightly less zoom

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments