differences

Reasons to consider the Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon F

Much narrower aperture f/22 vs f/5.6
Help
At its narrowest, the 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon F goes 3.9 f-stops narrower
Wider aperture f/4 vs f/4.5
Help
At its widest, the 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon F captures marginally more light (0.3 f-stops)
Slightly cheaper $169.00 vs $419.95
Help
The best price we've seen is $251 cheaper (2.5x less)
Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon F Learn more about
the Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon F

Reasons to consider the Nikon AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR

Image stabilization Nikon VR vs None
Help
Helps eliminate blur caused by small camera movements
More zoom 5.5x vs 4.3x
Help
Around 30% more zoom, giving you more flexibility for photos
Slightly better wide angle 55 mm vs 70 mm
Help
More than 20% better wide angle
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR Learn more about
the Nikon AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR

similarities

Compared to digital camera lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Max focal length Good telephoto Help
300 mm
Zoom range Great zoom Help
70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon F4.3x
AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR5.5x
Auto focus Auto focus Help
Easier to use
Prime lens Both are zoom lenses Help
Typically not as sharp as prime lenses
Aperture Very narrow widest aperture size Help
70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon Ff/4
AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VRf/4.5
Fixed aperture Both are variable aperture lenses Help
Narrower aperture at longer focal lengths

Compared to digital camera lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Lowest price Inexpensive Help
70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon F$169.00
AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR$419.95
Weight Light weight Help
70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon F0.6 kg
AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR0.5 kg
Min focal length Good wide-angle Help
70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon F70 mm
AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR55 mm
Length Short Help
70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon F119 mm
AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR122 mm
Diameter Small diameters Help
76 mm

LensHero is not aware of any interesting weaknesses shared by these two products.

competitors

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR Competitors

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR

Wildlife lens

$1,181 - $1,397

Wide minimum Much narrower aperture
Fixed aperture Has a constant aperture
Length Significantly longer
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 50mm f/1.8G

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 50mm f/1.8G

Low light lens

$177

Aperture Much wider aperture
Prime lens Is a prime lens
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Nikon F

Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Nikon F

Travel lens

$349

Zoom range Much more zoom
Wide minimum Much narrower aperture
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization

Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon F Competitors

Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Nikon F

Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Nikon F

Macro lens

$107 - $126

Magnification More magnification
Weight Slightly lighter
Wide minimum Much wider aperture
Pentax SMC  DA 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 ED AL DC WR

Pentax SMC DA 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 ED AL DC WR

Travel lens

$375 - $477

Zoom range More zoom
Length Shorter
Max focal length Worse telephoto

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 1 comments

Ajaz Khan (9:29 AM, March 01, 2014)
Hi,

I am getting a 1.5 years old "Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-300 mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR Lens" for
12000INR/ $192/115 GBP.

so how about it?