vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM

Much more zoom 13.9x vs 2.2x
Help
Around 6.5x more zoom, giving you more flexibility for photos
Image stabilization Sigma OS vs None
Help
Helps eliminate blur caused by small camera movements
Significantly better telephoto 250 mm vs 35 mm
Help
More than 7x more reach, less perspective distortion
Cheaper $399.00 vs $1,498.89
Help
The best price we've seen is $1,100 cheaper (3.8x less)
Slightly more magnification 1:3.4 (0.3x) vs 1:4.5 (0.2x)
Help
Take macro shots with subjects more than 30% larger in your photo
Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Learn more about
the Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM

Reasons to consider the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM

Fisheye lens Yes vs No
Help
Fisheye lenses take extremely wide 'circular' looking images
Has a consant aperture Yes vs No
Help
Constant aperture lenses offer the same aperture at all focal lengths
Wider aperture f/2.8 vs f/3.5
Help
At its widest, the EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM captures slightly more light, 0.6 f-stops
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM Learn more about
the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Focus motor Silent focus motor Help
18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM:Sigma HSM
EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM:Canon USM
Prime lens Both are zoom lenses Help
Typically not as sharp as prime lenses

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Travel lens

$699

Image stabilization Has better image stabilization
Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Focus motor Lacks a silent focus motor

Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Sony E-Mount 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3

Sony E-Mount 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3

Travel lens

$898

Focus motor Doesn't have a silent focus motor
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Sigma 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 DG IF Macro Canon-ef

Sigma 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 DG IF Macro Canon-ef

Travel lens

$299

Max focal length Better telephoto
Magnification Slightly more magnification
Focus motor Doesn't have a silent focus motor
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM

Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM

Wildlife lens

$399

Weight Slightly lighter
Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 II DC OS HSM

Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 II DC OS HSM

Wildlife lens

$349

Zoom range Less zoom
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR

Wildlife lens

$397

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Max focal length Better telephoto
Zoom range Much less zoom
Aperture Narrower aperture

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Wide angle lens

$739

Lowest price Cheaper
Magnification Slightly more magnification
Fisheye Not a fisheye
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

Wide angle lens

$759

Lowest price Cheaper
Weight Slightly lighter
Fisheye Not a fisheye
Fixed aperture Has a variable aperture
Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Canon-ef

Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Canon-ef

Wide angle lens

$594

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Lowest price Cheaper
Fisheye Not a fisheye
Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L II USM

Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L II USM

Fisheye lens

$2,159

Prime lens Is a prime lens
Magnification Less magnification
Zoom range Less zoom
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

Wide angle lens

$1,280

Magnification Slightly more magnification
Max focal length Slightly better telephoto
Fisheye Not a fisheye
Weight Slightly heavier

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments