vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Canon-ef

Much more zoom 13.9x vs 7.5x
Help
Around 90% more zoom, giving you more flexibility for photos
Has a silent focus motor Sigma HSM vs None
Help
Focuses quickly and silently
Better telephoto 250 mm vs 135 mm
Help
Around 90% more reach, less perspective distortion
Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Canon-ef Learn more about
the Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Canon-ef

Reasons to consider the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Better image stabilization Canon IS vs Sigma OS
Help
Less risk of blur
Slightly lighter 455 g vs 0.6 kg
Help
Around 30% lighter
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Learn more about
the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Zoom range Incredible zoom Help
18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Canon-ef:13.9x
EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS:7.5x
Image stabilization Good image stabilization Help
18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Canon-ef:Sigma OS
EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS:Canon IS
Prime lens Both are zoom lenses Help
Typically not as sharp as prime lenses
Fixed aperture Both are variable aperture lenses Help
Narrower aperture at longer focal lengths

Compared to travel lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

LensHero is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

LensHero is not aware of any interesting weaknesses shared by these two products.

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Travel lens

$699

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

Wildlife lens

$299

Zoom range Has significantly smaller zoom range
Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Travel lens

$479

Zoom range Has slightly smaller zoom range
Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Wide angle lens

$196 - $199

Max focal length Has a slightly longer telephoto lens
Zoom range Has significantly smaller zoom range
Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Wide angle lens

$1,059

Fixed aperture Has a fixed aperture
Zoom range Has significantly smaller zoom range
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

Wildlife lens

$649

Wide maximum Has a higher max f/stop
Min focal length Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
Zoom range Has significantly smaller zoom range
Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Travel lens

$699

Zoom range Has slightly smaller zoom range

Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Canon-ef Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Canon-ef

Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Canon-ef

Travel lens

$649

Zoom range More zoom
Weight Slightly lighter
Magnification Slightly less magnification
Sony DT 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3

Sony DT 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3

Travel lens

$648

Weight Slightly lighter
Focus motor Doesn't have a silent focus motor
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 II DC OS HSM Canon-ef

Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 II DC OS HSM Canon-ef

Travel lens

$349

Zoom range Less zoom
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Canon-ef

Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC Macro OS HSM Canon-ef

Travel lens

$399

Weight Slightly lighter

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR

Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR

Travel lens

Focus motor Has a silent focus motor
Zoom range Less zoom
Max focal length Slightly worse telephoto
Canon 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM

Canon 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM

Wildlife lens

$169

Focus motor Has a silent focus motor
Max focal length Better telephoto
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Zoom range Less zoom

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments