vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM APO Canon-ef

Much better telephoto 500 mm vs 200 mm
Help
2.5x more reach, less perspective distortion
Slightly more zoom 3.3x vs 2.9x
Help
Around 20% more zoom, giving you more flexibility for photos
Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM APO Canon-ef Learn more about
the Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM APO Canon-ef

Reasons to consider the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

Has a consant aperture Yes vs No
Help
Constant aperture lenses offer the same aperture at all focal lengths
Significantly narrower aperture f/32 vs f/22
Help
At its narrowest, the EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM goes 1.1 f-stops narrower
Wider aperture f/4 vs f/5
Help
At its widest, the EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM captures marginally more light, 0.6 f-stops
Better image stabilization Canon IS vs Sigma OS
Help
Less risk of blur
Lighter 0.8 kg vs 1.9 kg
Help
2.5x lighter
Shorter 172 mm vs 252 mm
Help
More than 30% shorter
Better wide angle 70 mm vs 150 mm
Help
2.1x better wide angle
Slightly smaller diameter 76 mm vs 95 mm
Help
20% smaller lens at the end
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Learn more about
the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Focus motor Silent focus motor Help
150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM APO Canon-ef:Sigma HSM
EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM:Canon USM
Image stabilization Good image stabilization Help
150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM APO Canon-ef:Sigma OS
EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM:Canon IS
Prime lens Both are zoom lenses Help
Typically not as sharp as prime lenses
Aperture Very narrow widest aperture size Help
150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM APO Canon-ef:f/5
EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM:f/4
Length Quite long Help
150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM APO Canon-ef:252 mm
EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM:172 mm

Compared to telephoto lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

LensHero is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

LensHero is not aware of any interesting weaknesses shared by these two products.

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

Wildlife lens

$649

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM

Wildlife lens

$1,399

Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM

Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM

Wildlife lens

$1,499

Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L USM

Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L USM

Sports lens

$1,289

Aperture Has a wider aperture
Image stabilization Doesn't have image stabilization
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Canon-ef

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Canon-ef

Sports lens

$1,249

Aperture Has a wider aperture
Weight Is heavier
Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Canon-ef

Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Canon-ef

Wildlife lens

$449

Focus motor Lacks a silent focus motor

Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM APO Canon-ef Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Sigma 50-500mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM APO Canon-ef

Sigma 50-500mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM APO Canon-ef

Wildlife lens

$1,509

Zoom range Much more zoom
Min focal length Better wide angle
Lowest price Slightly more expensive
Sigma 50-500mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM APO Nikon-f

Sigma 50-500mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM APO Nikon-f

Wildlife lens

$1,509

Zoom range Much more zoom
Min focal length Better wide angle
Lowest price Slightly more expensive
Sigma 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM APO Canon-ef

Sigma 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM APO Canon-ef

Wildlife lens

$899

Length Shorter
Aperture Wider aperture
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Tamron 200-500mm f/5-6.3 Di LD IF Canon-ef

Tamron 200-500mm f/5-6.3 Di LD IF Canon-ef

Wildlife lens

$949

Wide maximum Significantly narrower aperture
Weight Lighter
Focus motor Doesn't have a silent focus motor
Image stabilization No image stabilization

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Sports lens

$2,499

Aperture Wider aperture
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Weight Heavier
Lowest price More expensive
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Sports lens

$1,899

Aperture Wider aperture
Weight Heavier
Lowest price More expensive
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Wide angle lens

$1,149

Length Shorter
Zoom range More zoom
Wide maximum Significantly wider aperture
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD Macro Canon-ef

Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD Macro Canon-ef

Sports lens

$769

Aperture Wider aperture
Magnification More magnification
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Focus motor Doesn't have a silent focus motor

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments