vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX APO DG IF HSM Nikon-f

Much narrower aperture f/32 vs f/16
Help
At its narrowest, the 120-300mm f/2.8 EX APO DG IF HSM Nikon-f goes 2 f-stops narrower
Has a silent focus motor Sigma HSM vs None
Help
Focuses quickly and silently
Better telephoto 300 mm vs 135 mm
Help
More than 2x more reach, less perspective distortion
More zoom 2.5x vs 1x
Help
2.5x more zoom, giving you more flexibility for photos
Slightly better wide angle 120 mm vs 135 mm
Help
More than 10% better wide angle
Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX APO DG IF HSM Nikon-f Learn more about
the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX APO DG IF HSM Nikon-f

Reasons to consider the Nikon DC 135mm f/2D

Is a prime lens Yes vs No
Help
Prime lenses have a single focal length, they are typically sharper and have wider apertures
Significantly shorter 127 mm vs 269 mm
Help
2.1x shorter
Significantly lighter 0.8 kg vs 2.6 kg
Help
3.2x lighter
Wider aperture f/2 vs f/2.8
Help
At its widest, the DC 135mm f/2D captures slightly more light, 1 f-stop
Cheaper $1,149.00 vs $2,999.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $1,850 cheaper (2.6x less)
Slightly smaller diameter 79 mm vs 113 mm
Help
More than 30% smaller lens at the end
Nikon Nikkor DC 135mm f/2D Learn more about
the Nikon DC 135mm f/2D

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

LensHero is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

Magnification Poor magnification Help
120-300mm f/2.8 EX APO DG IF HSM Nikon-f:1:8.6 (0.1x)
DC 135mm f/2D:1:7.1 (0.1x)
Min focal length Poor wide angle Help
120-300mm f/2.8 EX APO DG IF HSM Nikon-f:120 mm
DC 135mm f/2D:135 mm

Compared to sports lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

LensHero is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
Risk of blur

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Nikon Nikkor AF 80-200mm f/2.8D ED

Nikon Nikkor AF 80-200mm f/2.8D ED

Sports lens

$999

Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Length Is longer

Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX APO DG IF HSM Nikon-f Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 300mm f/4D ED-IF

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 300mm f/4D ED-IF

Wildlife lens

$1,134

Prime lens Is a prime lens
Weight Lighter
Min focal length Significantly worse wide angle
Aperture Narrower aperture
Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS APO HSM Nikon-f

Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS APO HSM Nikon-f

Sports lens

$2,499

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Weight Slightly heavier
Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS APO HSM Canon-ef

Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS APO HSM Canon-ef

Sports lens

$2,499

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Weight Slightly heavier
Nikon Nikkor AF-S VR 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED

Nikon Nikkor AF-S VR 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED

Wildlife lens

$587

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Weight Significantly lighter
Fixed aperture Has a variable aperture
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Nikon Nikkor AF-S VR 200mm f/2 G IF-ED

Nikon Nikkor AF-S VR 200mm f/2 G IF-ED

Sports lens

$4,599

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Prime lens Is a prime lens
Min focal length Worse wide angle
Max focal length Worse telephoto

Nikon Nikkor DC 135mm f/2D Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM

Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM

Sports lens

$989

Wide maximum Much narrower aperture
Focus motor Has a silent focus motor
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 85mm f/1.4G

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 85mm f/1.4G

Low light lens

$1,629

Focus motor Has a silent focus motor
Aperture Wider aperture
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Lowest price Slightly more expensive
Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 135mm f/1.8 *

Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 135mm f/1.8 *

Sports lens

$1,798

Wide maximum Narrower aperture
Magnification More magnification
Lowest price Slightly more expensive
Weight Slightly heavier
Nikon Nikkor DC 105mm f/2D

Nikon Nikkor DC 105mm f/2D

Low light lens

$899

Min focal length Slightly better wide angle
Length Slightly shorter
Max focal length Slightly worse telephoto
Sigma 150mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM APO Macro

Sigma 150mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM APO Macro

Macro lens

$1,099

Magnification Much more magnification
Focus motor Has a silent focus motor
Aperture Narrower aperture
Weight Slightly heavier

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments