vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX APO DG IF HSM Nikon-f

Better wide angle 120 mm vs 200 mm
Help
40% better wide angle
Better telephoto 300 mm vs 200 mm
Help
50% more reach, less perspective distortion
Cheaper $2,999.00 vs $4,599.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $1,600 cheaper (more than 30% less)
More zoom 2.5x vs 1x
Help
2.5x more zoom, giving you more flexibility for photos
Slightly lighter 2.6 kg vs 2.9 kg
Help
More than 10% lighter
Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX APO DG IF HSM Nikon-f Learn more about
the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX APO DG IF HSM Nikon-f

Reasons to consider the Nikon AF-S VR 200mm f/2 G IF-ED

Image stabilization Nikon VR vs None
Help
Helps eliminate blur caused by small camera movements
Is a prime lens Yes vs No
Help
Prime lenses have a single focal length, they are typically sharper and have wider apertures
Wider aperture f/2 vs f/2.8
Help
At its widest, the AF-S VR 200mm f/2 G IF-ED captures slightly more light, 1 f-stop
Nikon Nikkor AF-S VR 200mm f/2 G IF-ED Learn more about
the Nikon AF-S VR 200mm f/2 G IF-ED

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Focus motor Silent focus motor Help
120-300mm f/2.8 EX APO DG IF HSM Nikon-f:Sigma HSM
AF-S VR 200mm f/2 G IF-ED:Nikon AF-S
Weight Heavy Help
120-300mm f/2.8 EX APO DG IF HSM Nikon-f:2.6 kg
AF-S VR 200mm f/2 G IF-ED:2.9 kg
Lowest price Very expensive Help
120-300mm f/2.8 EX APO DG IF HSM Nikon-f:$2,999.00
AF-S VR 200mm f/2 G IF-ED:$4,599.00
Magnification Poor magnification Help
120-300mm f/2.8 EX APO DG IF HSM Nikon-f:1:8.6 (0.1x)
AF-S VR 200mm f/2 G IF-ED:1:8.3 (0.1x)
Min focal length Poor wide angle Help
120-300mm f/2.8 EX APO DG IF HSM Nikon-f:120 mm
AF-S VR 200mm f/2 G IF-ED:200 mm

Compared to sports lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

LensHero is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

LensHero is not aware of any interesting weaknesses shared by these two products.

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 300mm f/4D ED-IF

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 300mm f/4D ED-IF

Wildlife lens

$1,134

Lowest price Is slightly less expensive
Magnification Has better macro
Min focal length Has a significantly narrower wide angle lens
Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Nikon Nikkor DC 135mm f/2D

Nikon Nikkor DC 135mm f/2D

Sports lens

$1,149

Lowest price Is slightly less expensive
Length Is shorter
Wide maximum Has a lower max f/stop
Focus motor Lacks a silent focus motor
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 200mm f/2 G ED VR II

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 200mm f/2 G ED VR II

Sports lens

$5,399

Image stabilization Has better image stabilization
Length Is shorter
Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
Min focal length Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II

Sports lens

$2,397

Image stabilization Has better image stabilization
Length Is shorter
Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Wide maximum Has a lower max f/stop
Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Sports lens

$6,799

Image stabilization Has better image stabilization
Lowest price Is significantly more expensive
Min focal length Has a significantly narrower wide angle lens

Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX APO DG IF HSM Nikon-f Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Sports lens

$2,199

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Weight Lighter
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM

Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM

Wildlife lens

$1,699

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Weight Lighter
Fixed aperture Has a variable aperture
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Tamron 200-500mm f/5-6.3 Di LD IF Nikon-f

Tamron 200-500mm f/5-6.3 Di LD IF Nikon-f

Wildlife lens

$949

Max focal length Significantly better telephoto
Weight Lighter
Aperture Much narrower aperture
Fixed aperture Has a variable aperture
Nikon Nikkor AF-S VR 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED

Nikon Nikkor AF-S VR 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED

Wildlife lens

$587

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Weight Significantly lighter
Fixed aperture Has a variable aperture
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS APO HSM Nikon-f

Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 EX DG OS APO HSM Nikon-f

Sports lens

$2,499

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Weight Slightly heavier

Nikon Nikkor AF-S VR 200mm f/2 G IF-ED Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon 50mm f/1.4 USM

Canon 50mm f/1.4 USM

Low light lens

$349

Weight Much lighter
Lowest price Significantly cheaper
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM APO Sony-alpha

Sigma 150-500mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM APO Sony-alpha

Wildlife lens

$999

Max focal length Much better telephoto
Lowest price Significantly cheaper
Aperture Much narrower aperture
Prime lens Is a zoom lens
Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 135mm f/1.8 *

Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 135mm f/1.8 *

Sports lens

$1,798

Weight Significantly lighter
Lowest price Cheaper
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Focus motor Doesn't have a silent focus motor
Rokinon 85mm f/1.4 Four-thirds

Rokinon 85mm f/1.4 Four-thirds

Sports lens

$269

Lowest price Significantly cheaper
Weight Significantly lighter
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Auto focus Auto focus
Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM

Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM

Sports lens

$955

Weight Significantly lighter
Lowest price Significantly cheaper
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Max focal length Worse telephoto

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments