vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Nikon Micro 105mm f/2.8 AIS

More magnification 1:2 (0.5x) vs 1:5.3 (0.2x)
Help
Take macro shots with subjects more than 2.5x larger in your photo
Slightly better wide angle 105 mm vs 135 mm
Help
More than 20% better wide angle
Slightly lighter 0.5 kg vs 0.7 kg
Help
More than 30% lighter
Nikon Nikkor Micro 105mm f/2.8 AIS Learn more about
the Nikon Micro 105mm f/2.8 AIS

Reasons to consider the Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM

Auto focus Yes vs No
Help
Has a silent focus motor Canon USM vs None
Help
Focuses quickly and silently
Wider aperture f/2 vs f/2.8
Help
At its widest, the EF 135mm f/2L USM captures slightly more light, 1 f-stop
Slightly better telephoto 135 mm vs 105 mm
Help
Around 30% more reach, less perspective distortion
Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Learn more about
the Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Prime lens Fixed focal length prime lenses Help
Typically very sharp
Zoom range Poor zoom Help
1x

Compared to portrait lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

LensHero is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
Risk of blur
Min focal length Poor wide angle Help
Micro 105mm f/2.8 AIS:105 mm
EF 135mm f/2L USM:135 mm

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

Macro lens

$539

Magnification Has better macro
Image stabilization Has image stabilization
Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro

Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro

Macro lens

$519

Magnification Has better macro
Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Nikon Nikkor DC 135mm f/2D

Nikon Nikkor DC 135mm f/2D

Sports lens

$1,149

Wide maximum Has a lower max f/stop

Nikon Nikkor Micro 105mm f/2.8 AIS Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Nikon Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR

Nikon Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR

Macro lens

$879

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Auto focus Auto focus
Weight Slightly heavier
Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX MACRO DG OS HSM

Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX MACRO DG OS HSM

Sports lens

$835

Auto focus Auto focus
Focus motor Has a silent focus motor
Tamron 90mm f/2.8 SP Di Macro Nikon-f

Tamron 90mm f/2.8 SP Di Macro Nikon-f

Macro lens

$499

Auto focus Auto focus
Magnification Significantly more magnification
Max focal length Slightly worse telephoto
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 200mm f/2 G ED VR II

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 200mm f/2 G ED VR II

Sports lens

$5,399

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Auto focus Auto focus
Lowest price Significantly more expensive
Weight Significantly heavier
Nikon Nikkor Micro 200mm f/4D ED-IF

Nikon Nikkor Micro 200mm f/4D ED-IF

Macro lens

$1,359

Auto focus Auto focus
Magnification Significantly more magnification
Aperture Narrower aperture
Min focal length Worse wide angle

Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM

Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM

Sports lens

$741

Max focal length Better telephoto
Aperture Narrower aperture
Min focal length Worse wide angle
Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM

Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM

Sports lens

$894

Aperture Wider aperture
Min focal length Better wide angle
Wide maximum Much wider aperture
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM

Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM

Low light lens

$370

Min focal length Better wide angle
Length Shorter
Wide maximum Significantly wider aperture
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

Telephoto lens

$1,349

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Min focal length Better wide angle
Prime lens Is a zoom lens
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments