vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Nikon DC 135mm f/2D

Is a prime lens Yes vs No
Help
Prime lenses have a single focal length, they are typically sharper and have wider apertures
Shorter 127 mm vs 206 mm
Help
Around 40% shorter
Wider aperture f/2 vs f/2.8
Help
At its widest, the DC 135mm f/2D captures slightly more light, 1 f-stop
Cheaper $1,149.00 vs $2,396.95
Help
The best price we've seen is $1,248 cheaper (2.1x less)
Lighter 0.8 kg vs 1.5 kg
Help
More than 40% lighter
Nikon Nikkor DC 135mm f/2D Learn more about
the Nikon DC 135mm f/2D

Reasons to consider the Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II

Image stabilization Nikon VR II vs None
Help
Helps eliminate blur caused by small camera movements
Has a silent focus motor Nikon AF-S vs None
Help
Focuses quickly and silently
Narrower aperture f/22 vs f/16
Help
At its narrowest, the AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II goes 0.9 f-stops narrower
Better wide angle 70 mm vs 135 mm
Help
Around 50% better wide angle
More zoom 2.9x vs 1x
Help
Around 3x more zoom, giving you more flexibility for photos
Better telephoto 200 mm vs 135 mm
Help
Around 50% more reach, less perspective distortion
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Learn more about
the Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

LensHero is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

Magnification Poor magnification Help
DC 135mm f/2D:1:7.1 (0.1x)
AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II:1:8.3 (0.1x)

Compared to sports lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Weight Light weight Help
DC 135mm f/2D:0.8 kg
AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II:1.5 kg
Wide maximum Not very narrow apertures Help
DC 135mm f/2D:f/16
AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II:f/22

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Nikon Nikkor AF 80-200mm f/2.8D ED

Nikon Nikkor AF 80-200mm f/2.8D ED

Sports lens

$999

Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Length Is longer
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 85mm f/1.4G

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 85mm f/1.4G

Low light lens

$1,649

Aperture Has a wider aperture
Nikon Nikkor  180mm f/2.8D ED-IF

Nikon Nikkor 180mm f/2.8D ED-IF

Sports lens

$749

Min focal length Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 85mm f/1.8G

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 85mm f/1.8G

Low light lens

$719

Nikon Nikkor  85mm f/1.8D

Nikon Nikkor 85mm f/1.8D

Low light lens

$429

Nikon Nikkor DC 135mm f/2D Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 135mm f/1.8 *

Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 135mm f/1.8 *

Sports lens

$1,798

Wide maximum Narrower aperture
Magnification More magnification
Lowest price Slightly more expensive
Weight Slightly heavier
Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM

Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM

Sports lens

$955

Wide maximum Much narrower aperture
Focus motor Has a silent focus motor
Nikon Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR

Nikon Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G ED-IF AF-S VR

Macro lens

$879

Magnification Much more magnification
Image stabilization Image stabilization
Aperture Narrower aperture
Max focal length Slightly worse telephoto
Nikon Nikkor DC 105mm f/2D

Nikon Nikkor DC 105mm f/2D

Low light lens

$899

Min focal length Slightly better wide angle
Length Slightly shorter
Max focal length Slightly worse telephoto

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Sports lens

$1,899

Wide maximum Significantly narrower aperture
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Nikon-f

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Nikon-f

Sports lens

$1,249

Lowest price Cheaper
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 II EX DG APO Macro HSM Nikon-f

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 II EX DG APO Macro HSM Nikon-f

Sports lens

$799

Lowest price Cheaper
Magnification More magnification
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR

Travel lens

$1,047

Zoom range Much more zoom
Length Shorter
Fixed aperture Has a variable aperture
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Sports lens

$2,199

Wide maximum Significantly narrower aperture
Magnification More magnification

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments