Nikon NikkorDC 135mm f/2D vs CanonEF 135mm f/2L USM
differences
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
similarities
Compared to digital camera lenses
| Common Strengths | Common Weaknesses | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Compared to digital camera lenses
| Common Strengths | Common Weaknesses | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
competitors
Nikon Nikkor DC 135mm f/2D Competitors
Nikon Nikkor DC 105mm f/2D
Low light lens
$1,197
 | Better wide angle |
| Slightly lighter |
| Slightly worse telephoto |
Nikon Nikkor 180mm f/2.8D ED-IF
Sports lens
| Narrower aperture |
| Better telephoto |
| Narrower aperture |
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II
Sports lens
$2,146
| Has a silent focus motor |
| Image stabilization |
| Is a zoom lens |
Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Competitors
Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM
Low light lens
$1,500 - $1,899
| Wider aperture |
| Better wide angle |
| Much wider aperture |
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM
Macro lens
$709 - $799
| Image stabilization |
| Significantly more magnification |
| Narrower aperture |
Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM
Sports lens
$749
| Better telephoto |
| Narrower aperture |
discussion Which do you think is better?
Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.
Showing 0 comments