vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Nikon AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED

Wider aperture f/4 vs f/4.5
Help
At its widest, the AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED captures marginally more light, 0.3 f-stops
Slightly shorter 100 mm vs 123 mm
Help
Around 20% shorter
Slightly lighter 335 g vs 0.6 kg
Help
More than 40% lighter
Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED Learn more about
the Nikon AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED

Reasons to consider the Nikon AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR

Better telephoto 300 mm vs 200 mm
Help
50% more reach, less perspective distortion
More zoom 5.5x vs 3.6x
Help
Around 50% more zoom, giving you more flexibility for photos
Slightly more magnification 1:3.6 (0.3x) vs 1:4 (0.2x)
Help
Take macro shots with subjects more than 10% larger in your photo
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR Learn more about
the Nikon AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Image stabilization Very good image stabilization Help
Nikon VR
Focus motor Silent focus motor Help
Silent and fast
Prime lens Both are zoom lenses Help
Typically not as sharp as prime lenses
Aperture Very narrow widest aperture size Help
AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED:f/4
AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR:f/4.5
Fixed aperture Both are variable aperture lenses Help
Narrower aperture at longer focal lengths

Compared to wildlife lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Weight Light weight Help
AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED:335 g
AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR:0.6 kg
Min focal length Good wide-angle Help
55 mm
Lowest price Inexpensive Help
AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED:$246.95
AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR:$396.95
Length Short Help
AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED:100 mm
AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR:123 mm

LensHero is not aware of any interesting weaknesses shared by these two products.

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Nikon Nikkor  70-300mm f/4-5.6G

Nikon Nikkor 70-300mm f/4-5.6G

Wildlife lens

$150

Wide maximum Has a higher max f/stop
Image stabilization Doesn't have image stabilization
Focus motor Lacks a silent focus motor
Nikon Nikkor AF-S VR 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED

Nikon Nikkor AF-S VR 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED

Wildlife lens

$587

Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon-f

Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro Nikon-f

Macro lens

$199

Magnification Has better macro
Image stabilization Doesn't have image stabilization
Focus motor Lacks a silent focus motor
Nikon Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR AF-S DX

Nikon Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR AF-S DX

Travel lens

$330

Max focal length Has a slightly longer telephoto lens
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

Wildlife lens

$299

Focus motor Lacks a silent focus motor
Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Nikon-f

Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Nikon-f

Wildlife lens

$449

Image stabilization Has worse image stabilization
Focus motor Lacks a silent focus motor
Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Nikon-f

Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Nikon-f

Macro lens

$199

Magnification Has better macro
Image stabilization Doesn't have image stabilization
Focus motor Lacks a silent focus motor

Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

No significant competitors found that are specific to the Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX VR 55-200mm f/4-5.6G IF-ED.

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

No significant competitors found that are specific to the Nikon Nikkor AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR.

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments