vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II

Image stabilization Nikon VR II vs None
Help
Helps eliminate blur caused by small camera movements
Has a silent focus motor Nikon AF-S vs None
Help
Focuses quickly and silently
Better wide angle 70 mm vs 180 mm
Help
2.6x better wide angle
More zoom 2.9x vs 1x
Help
Around 3x more zoom, giving you more flexibility for photos
Slightly better telephoto 200 mm vs 180 mm
Help
More than 10% more reach, less perspective distortion
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Learn more about
the Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II

Reasons to consider the Nikon 180mm f/2.8D ED-IF

Is a prime lens Yes vs No
Help
Prime lenses have a single focal length, they are typically sharper and have wider apertures
Cheaper $749.00 vs $2,396.95
Help
The best price we've seen is $1,648 cheaper (3.2x less)
Shorter 145 mm vs 206 mm
Help
Around 30% shorter
Lighter 0.8 kg vs 1.5 kg
Help
Around 50% lighter
Slightly more magnification 1:6.6 (0.2x) vs 1:8.3 (0.1x)
Help
Take macro shots with subjects around 30% larger in your photo
Nikon Nikkor  180mm f/2.8D ED-IF Learn more about
the Nikon 180mm f/2.8D ED-IF

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

LensHero is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

Magnification Poor magnification Help
AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II:1:8.3 (0.1x)
180mm f/2.8D ED-IF:1:6.6 (0.2x)

Compared to sports lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Weight Light weight Help
AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II:1.5 kg
180mm f/2.8D ED-IF:0.8 kg
Wide maximum Not very narrow apertures Help
f/22

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Sports lens

$1,899

Wide maximum Has a higher max f/stop
Length Is longer
Weight Is heavier
Nikon Nikkor AF 80-200mm f/2.8D ED

Nikon Nikkor AF 80-200mm f/2.8D ED

Sports lens

$999

Length Is longer
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 II EX DG APO Macro HSM Nikon-f

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 II EX DG APO Macro HSM Nikon-f

Sports lens

$799

Magnification Has better macro
Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD Macro Nikon-f

Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD Macro Nikon-f

Sports lens

$769

Wide maximum Has a higher max f/stop
Magnification Has better macro
Length Is longer
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Sports lens

$2,499

Wide maximum Has a higher max f/stop
Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
Length Is longer
Nikon Nikkor DC 135mm f/2D

Nikon Nikkor DC 135mm f/2D

Sports lens

$1,149

Aperture Has a wider aperture
Min focal length Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
Wide maximum Has a lower max f/stop
Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 135mm f/1.8 *

Sony Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* 135mm f/1.8 *

Sports lens

$1,798

Aperture Has a wider aperture
Min focal length Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Nikon-f

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Nikon-f

Sports lens

$1,249

Lowest price Cheaper
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
Nikon Nikkor VR 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D ED

Nikon Nikkor VR 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6D ED

Wildlife lens

$1,499

Max focal length Significantly better telephoto
Wide maximum Significantly narrower aperture
Fixed aperture Has a variable aperture
Focus motor Doesn't have a silent focus motor
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR

Travel lens

$1,047

Zoom range Much more zoom
Length Shorter
Fixed aperture Has a variable aperture
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization

Nikon Nikkor 180mm f/2.8D ED-IF Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Leica Summicron 90mm f/2 APO M

Leica Summicron 90mm f/2 APO M

Low light lens

$3,995

Min focal length Better wide angle
Aperture Wider aperture
Lowest price Significantly more expensive
Wide maximum Wider aperture
Nikon Nikkor  85mm f/1.8D

Nikon Nikkor 85mm f/1.8D

Low light lens

$429

Aperture Wider aperture
Min focal length Better wide angle
Wide maximum Wider aperture
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Olympus 150mm f/2 ED

Olympus 150mm f/2 ED

Sports lens

$2,499

Aperture Wider aperture
Min focal length Slightly better wide angle
Lowest price More expensive
Weight Heavier

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments