differences

Reasons to consider the Nikon AF-S 400mm f/2.8G ED VR

Much cheaper $404.97 vs $9,999.99
Help
The best price we've seen is $9,595 cheaper (24.7x less)
Slightly smaller diameter 160 mm vs 163 mm
Help
Almost the same
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 400mm f/2.8G ED VR Learn more about
the Nikon AF-S 400mm f/2.8G ED VR

Reasons to consider the Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Significantly narrower aperture f/32 vs f/22
Help
At its narrowest, the EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM goes 1.1 f-stops narrower
Better image stabilization Canon IS II vs Nikon VR
Help
Less risk of blur
Lighter 3.9 kg vs 4.6 kg
Help
Around 20% lighter
Shorter 343 mm vs 368 mm
Help
Around 10% shorter
Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM Learn more about
the Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM

similarities

Compared to digital camera lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Image stabilization Very good image stabilization Help
AF-S 400mm f/2.8G ED VRNikon VR
EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USMCanon IS II
Max focal length Excellent telephoto Help
400 mm
Prime lens Fixed focal length prime lenses Help
Typically very sharp
Auto focus Auto focus Help
Easier to use
Min focal length Poor wide angle Help
400 mm
Diameter Quite large diameters Help
AF-S 400mm f/2.8G ED VR160 mm
EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM163 mm
Length Quite long Help
AF-S 400mm f/2.8G ED VR368 mm
EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM343 mm
Weight Heavy Help
AF-S 400mm f/2.8G ED VR4.6 kg
EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM3.9 kg

Compared to digital camera lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

LensHero is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

LensHero is not aware of any interesting weaknesses shared by these two products.

competitors

Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM Competitors

Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Sports lens

$5,699 - $6,099

Lowest price Much cheaper
Diameter Significantly smaller diameter
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Canon EF 200mm f/2L IS USM

Canon EF 200mm f/2L IS USM

Sports lens

$5,699

Lowest price Much cheaper
Min focal length Much better wide angle
Max focal length Significantly worse telephoto

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 400mm f/2.8G ED VR Competitors

Sigma 800mm f/5.6 EX DG APO HSM

Sigma 800mm f/5.6 EX DG APO HSM

Wildlife lens

$7,627

Max focal length Much better telephoto
Wide minimum Significantly narrower aperture
Lowest price Much more expensive

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments