differences

Reasons to consider the Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM O.I.S. WR

Wider aperture f/2.8 vs f/4
Help
At its widest, the XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM O.I.S. WR captures slightly more light (1 f-stop)
Slightly better wide angle 50 mm vs 70 mm
Help
Around 30% better wide angle
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM O.I.S. WR Learn more about
the Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM O.I.S. WR

Reasons to consider the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

Image stabilization Canon IS vs None
Help
Helps eliminate blur caused by small camera movements
Significantly narrower aperture f/32 vs f/22
Help
At its narrowest, the EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM goes 1.1 f-stops narrower
Better telephoto 200 mm vs 140 mm
Help
More than 40% more reach, less perspective distortion
Slightly smaller diameter 76 mm vs 83 mm
Help
Around 10% smaller lens at the end
Slightly lighter 0.8 kg vs 1 kg
Help
More than 20% lighter
Slightly more magnification 1:4.8 (0.2) vs 1:8.3 (0.1)
Help
Take macro shots with subjects around 80% larger in your photo
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Learn more about
the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

similarities

Compared to digital camera lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Fixed aperture Constant aperture lenses Help
The same maximum aperture at all focal lengths
Auto focus Auto focus Help
Easier to use
Prime lens Both are zoom lenses Help
Typically not as sharp as prime lenses
Length Quite long Help
XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM O.I.S. WR176 mm
EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM173 mm

Compared to digital camera lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

LensHero is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

LensHero is not aware of any interesting weaknesses shared by these two products.

competitors

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM O.I.S. WR Competitors

Olympus M.Zuiko  ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO

Olympus M.Zuiko ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO

Sports lens

$1,149 - $1,299

Magnification More magnification
Zoom range More zoom
Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS

Sony FE 70-200mm f/4 G OSS

Telephoto lens

$1,318 - $1,398

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Max focal length Better telephoto
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L USM

Sports lens

$1,019 - $1,299

Wide minimum Significantly narrower aperture
Max focal length Better telephoto
Weight Slightly heavier

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Competitors

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM

Wildlife lens

$140 - $299

Length Shorter
Lowest price Cheaper
Wide minimum Much wider aperture
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Sports lens

$1,460 - $1,799

Aperture Wider aperture
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Weight Heavier
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Travel lens

$267 - $400

Zoom range Significantly more zoom
Length Shorter
Fixed aperture Has a variable aperture

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments