vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Much more zoom 11.1x vs 2.9x
Help
Around 4x more zoom, giving you more flexibility for photos
Shorter 102 mm vs 172 mm
Help
More than 40% shorter
Better wide angle 18 mm vs 70 mm
Help
3.9x better wide angle
Wider aperture f/3.5 vs f/4
Help
At its widest, the EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS captures marginally more light, 0.4 f-stops
Slightly cheaper $699.00 vs $1,149.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $450 cheaper (around 40% less)
Slightly more magnification 1:4 (0.2x) vs 1:4.8 (0.2x)
Help
Take macro shots with subjects more than 20% larger in your photo
Slightly lighter 0.6 kg vs 0.8 kg
Help
More than 20% lighter
Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Learn more about
the Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Reasons to consider the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

Has a consant aperture Yes vs No
Help
Constant aperture lenses offer the same aperture at all focal lengths
Has a silent focus motor Canon USM vs None
Help
Focuses quickly and silently
Significantly narrower aperture f/32 vs f/22
Help
At its narrowest, the EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM goes 1.1 f-stops narrower
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Learn more about
the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Image stabilization Very good image stabilization Help
Canon IS
Prime lens Both are zoom lenses Help
Typically not as sharp as prime lenses

Compared to telephoto lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Min focal length Good wide-angle Help
EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS:18 mm
EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM:70 mm
Weight Light weight Help
EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS:0.6 kg
EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM:0.8 kg

LensHero is not aware of any interesting weaknesses shared by these two products.

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

Wildlife lens

$649

Max focal length Has a slightly shorter telephoto lens
Min focal length Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

Wildlife lens

$299

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Wide angle lens

$1,149

Max focal length Has a slightly longer telephoto lens
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

Telephoto lens

$629

Min focal length Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
Image stabilization Doesn't have image stabilization
Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Canon-ef

Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Canon-ef

Wildlife lens

$449

Max focal length Has a slightly shorter telephoto lens
Min focal length Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
Image stabilization Has worse image stabilization

Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Travel lens

$499 - $549

Weight Slightly lighter
Zoom range Less zoom
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Canon-ef

Tamron 18-270mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD Canon-ef

Travel lens

$649

Focus motor Has a silent focus motor
Zoom range Significantly more zoom
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Wide angle lens

$1,059

Fixed aperture Has a consant aperture
Focus motor Has a silent focus motor
Zoom range Much less zoom
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II

Nikon Nikkor AF-S DX 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR II

Travel lens

$847

Focus motor Has a silent focus motor
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 II DC OS HSM Canon-ef

Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 II DC OS HSM Canon-ef

Travel lens

$349

Focus motor Has a silent focus motor
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Sports lens

$2,499

Aperture Wider aperture
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Weight Heavier
Lowest price More expensive
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM

Wildlife lens

$1,399

Max focal length Better telephoto
Zoom range More zoom
Fixed aperture Has a variable aperture
Weight Slightly heavier
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Sports lens

$1,899

Aperture Wider aperture
Weight Heavier
Lowest price More expensive
Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L USM

Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L USM

Sports lens

$1,289

Aperture Wider aperture
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Weight Heavier
Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM

Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM

Wildlife lens

$1,499

Max focal length Significantly better telephoto
Zoom range More zoom
Fixed aperture Has a variable aperture
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments