vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM

Better telephoto 300 mm vs 200 mm
Help
50% more reach, less perspective distortion
Shorter 143 mm vs 199 mm
Help
Around 30% shorter
More zoom 4.3x vs 2.9x
Help
Around 50% more zoom, giving you more flexibility for photos
Cheaper $1,399.00 vs $2,499.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $1,100 cheaper (more than 40% less)
Lighter 1 kg vs 1.5 kg
Help
Around 30% lighter
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM Learn more about
the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM

Reasons to consider the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Has a consant aperture Yes vs No
Help
Constant aperture lenses offer the same aperture at all focal lengths
Wider aperture f/2.8 vs f/4
Help
At its widest, the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM captures slightly more light, 1 f-stop
Better image stabilization Canon IS II vs Canon IS
Help
Less risk of blur
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Learn more about
the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Image stabilization Very good image stabilization Help
EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM:Canon IS
EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM:Canon IS II
Focus motor Silent focus motor Help
Silent and fast
Wide maximum Wide aperture Help
f/32
Prime lens Both are zoom lenses Help
Typically not as sharp as prime lenses

Compared to telephoto lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Min focal length Good wide-angle Help
70 mm

LensHero is not aware of any interesting weaknesses shared by these two products.

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

Telephoto lens

$1,149

Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Sports lens

$1,899

Length Is longer
Canon 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM

Canon 28-300mm f/3.5-5.6L IS USM

Travel lens

$2,554

Wide maximum Has a higher max f/stop
Zoom range Has much large zoom range
Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

Wildlife lens

$299

Weight Is lighter
Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Focus motor Lacks a silent focus motor
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

Wildlife lens

$649

Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

Telephoto lens

$629

Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Image stabilization Doesn't have image stabilization
Sony 70-200mm f/2.8 APO G SSM

Sony 70-200mm f/2.8 APO G SSM

Sports lens

$1,998

Image stabilization Doesn't have image stabilization
Length Is longer

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM

Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM

Wildlife lens

$1,499

Max focal length Better telephoto
Aperture Narrower aperture
Min focal length Slightly worse wide angle
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM

Wildlife lens

$1,289

Length Shorter
Weight Slightly lighter
Aperture Narrower aperture
Sigma 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM APO Canon-ef

Sigma 120-400mm f/4.5-5.6 DG OS HSM APO Canon-ef

Wildlife lens

$899

Max focal length Better telephoto
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Wide maximum Significantly wider aperture
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 II EX DG APO Macro HSM Canon-ef

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 II EX DG APO Macro HSM Canon-ef

Sports lens

$799

Lowest price Cheaper
Magnification Slightly more magnification
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Wide maximum Significantly wider aperture
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II

Sports lens

$2,397

Wide maximum Significantly wider aperture
Magnification Less magnification

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments