vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

Image stabilization Canon IS vs None
Help
Helps eliminate blur caused by small camera movements
Better telephoto 300 mm vs 200 mm
Help
50% more reach, less perspective distortion
More zoom 4.3x vs 2.9x
Help
Around 50% more zoom, giving you more flexibility for photos
Shorter 142 mm vs 172 mm
Help
Around 20% shorter
Slightly more magnification 1:4 (0.2x) vs 1:4.8 (0.2x)
Help
Take macro shots with subjects more than 20% larger in your photo
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Learn more about
the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

Reasons to consider the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

Has a consant aperture Yes vs No
Help
Constant aperture lenses offer the same aperture at all focal lengths
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Learn more about
the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Focus motor Silent focus motor Help
Silent and fast
Wide maximum Wide aperture Help
f/32
Prime lens Both are zoom lenses Help
Typically not as sharp as prime lenses
Aperture Very narrow widest aperture size Help
f/4

Compared to telephoto lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Weight Light weight Help
EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM:0.6 kg
EF 70-200mm f/4L USM:0.7 kg
Min focal length Good wide-angle Help
70 mm
Lowest price Inexpensive Help
EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM:$649.00
EF 70-200mm f/4L USM:$629.00

LensHero is not aware of any interesting weaknesses shared by these two products.

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM

Canon 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM

Wildlife lens

$169

Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Canon-ef

Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Canon-ef

Wildlife lens

$449

Focus motor Lacks a silent focus motor
Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS

Wildlife lens

$299

Focus motor Lacks a silent focus motor
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

Telephoto lens

$1,149

Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Canon EF-S 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Travel lens

$699

Min focal length Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
Zoom range Has way more large zoom range
Wide maximum Has a lower max f/stop
Focus motor Lacks a silent focus motor
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR

Wildlife lens

$397

Wide maximum Has a lower max f/stop
Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM

Wildlife lens

$1,349

Prime lens Is a fixed focal length prime lens
Min focal length Has a much narrower wide angle lens
Length Is longer

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG OS Canon-ef

Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG OS Canon-ef

Wildlife lens

$309

Length Slightly shorter
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Wide maximum Much wider aperture
Focus motor Doesn't have a silent focus motor
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Travel lens

$499 - $549

Zoom range More zoom
Min focal length Better wide angle
Focus motor Doesn't have a silent focus motor
Max focal length Worse telephoto

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD Macro Canon-ef

Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD Macro Canon-ef

Sports lens

$769

Aperture Wider aperture
Magnification More magnification
Focus motor Doesn't have a silent focus motor
Weight Heavier
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Wide angle lens

$1,149

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Length Shorter
Wide maximum Significantly wider aperture
Max focal length Worse telephoto

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments