vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

Significantly narrower aperture f/32 vs f/22
Help
At its narrowest, the EF 70-200mm f/4L USM goes 1.1 f-stops narrower
Better telephoto 200 mm vs 85 mm
Help
Around 2.5x more reach, less perspective distortion
More zoom 2.9x vs 1x
Help
Around 3x more zoom, giving you more flexibility for photos
Slightly more magnification 1:4.8 (0.2x) vs 1:7 (0.1x)
Help
Take macro shots with subjects around 50% larger in your photo
Slightly better wide angle 70 mm vs 85 mm
Help
Around 20% better wide angle
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Learn more about
the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

Reasons to consider the Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM

Much wider aperture f/1.8 vs f/4
Help
At its widest, the 85mm f/1.8 USM captures much more light, 2.3 f-stops
Is a prime lens Yes vs No
Help
Prime lenses have a single focal length, they are typically sharper and have wider apertures
Shorter 71 mm vs 172 mm
Help
2.4x shorter
Slightly lighter 422 g vs 0.7 kg
Help
More than 40% lighter
Slightly cheaper $369.95 vs $629.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $259 cheaper (more than 40% less)
Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM Learn more about
the Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Focus motor Silent focus motor Help
Silent and fast

LensHero is not aware of any interesting weaknesses shared by these two products.

Compared to portrait lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

LensHero is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
Risk of blur
Magnification Poor magnification Help
EF 70-200mm f/4L USM:1:4.8 (0.2x)
85mm f/1.8 USM:1:7 (0.1x)

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II

Low light lens

$98 - $125

Focus motor Lacks a silent focus motor
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

Macro lens

$549

Magnification Has better macro
Image stabilization Has image stabilization
Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM

Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM

Sports lens

$989

Min focal length Has a slightly narrower wide angle lens
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

Telephoto lens

$1,149

Image stabilization Has image stabilization
Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Length Is longer

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD Macro Canon-ef

Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD Macro Canon-ef

Sports lens

$769

Aperture Wider aperture
Magnification More magnification
Focus motor Doesn't have a silent focus motor
Weight Heavier
Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Canon-ef

Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Canon-ef

Wildlife lens

$449

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Max focal length Better telephoto
Fixed aperture Has a variable aperture
Focus motor Doesn't have a silent focus motor
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

Wildlife lens

$649

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Max focal length Better telephoto
Fixed aperture Has a variable aperture
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Wide angle lens

$1,149

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Length Shorter
Wide maximum Significantly wider aperture
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM

Wildlife lens

$1,349

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Prime lens Is a prime lens
Min focal length Much worse wide angle
Zoom range Less zoom

Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon 50mm f/1.4 USM

Canon 50mm f/1.4 USM

Low light lens

Aperture Wider aperture
Min focal length Better wide angle
Max focal length Slightly worse telephoto
Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM

Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM

Sports lens

$894

Aperture Wider aperture
Wide maximum Wider aperture
Lowest price Slightly more expensive
Canon EF 35mm f/2

Canon EF 35mm f/2

Low light lens

$289

Min focal length Better wide angle
Magnification More magnification
Focus motor Doesn't have a silent focus motor
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro

Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro

Macro lens

$519

Magnification Much more magnification
Wide maximum Significantly narrower aperture
Aperture Narrower aperture
Length Longer
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 85mm f/1.8G

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 85mm f/1.8G

Low light lens

$580

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments