vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Much better wide angle 70 mm vs 300 mm
Help
4.3x better wide angle
Wider aperture f/2.8 vs f/4
Help
At its widest, the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM captures slightly more light, 1 f-stop
More zoom 2.9x vs 1x
Help
Around 3x more zoom, giving you more flexibility for photos
Slightly shorter 196 mm vs 221 mm
Help
More than 10% shorter
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Learn more about
the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM

Reasons to consider the Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM

Is a prime lens Yes vs No
Help
Prime lenses have a single focal length, they are typically sharper and have wider apertures
Better telephoto 300 mm vs 200 mm
Help
50% more reach, less perspective distortion
Slightly more magnification 1:4.2 (0.2x) vs 1:5.8 (0.2x)
Help
Take macro shots with subjects around 40% larger in your photo
Slightly cheaper $1,349.00 vs $1,899.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $550 cheaper (around 30% less)
Slightly lighter 1.2 kg vs 1.5 kg
Help
Around 20% lighter
Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM Learn more about
the Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Image stabilization Very good image stabilization Help
Canon IS
Focus motor Silent focus motor Help
Silent and fast
Wide maximum Wide aperture Help
f/32
Length Quite long Help
EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM:196 mm
EF 300mm f/4L IS USM:221 mm

Compared to telephoto lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

LensHero is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

Zoom range Poor zoom Help
EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM:2.9x
EF 300mm f/4L IS USM:1x

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM

Sports lens

$2,499

Image stabilization Has better image stabilization
Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM

Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM

Wildlife lens

$1,499

Max focal length Has a slightly shorter telephoto lens
Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Fixed aperture Has a variable aperture
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

Wildlife lens

$649

Length Is shorter
Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Fixed aperture Has a variable aperture
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L USM

Telephoto lens

$629

Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Image stabilization Doesn't have image stabilization
Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM

Wildlife lens

$1,399

Length Is shorter
Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Fixed aperture Has a variable aperture
Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

Wide angle lens

$1,280

Length Is shorter
Max focal length Has a slightly longer telephoto lens
Wide maximum Has a lower max f/stop

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II

Sports lens

$2,397

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Wide maximum Significantly wider aperture
Lowest price Slightly more expensive
Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD Macro Canon-ef

Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD Macro Canon-ef

Sports lens

$769

Magnification More magnification
Lowest price Cheaper
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Focus motor Doesn't have a silent focus motor
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Canon-ef

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Canon-ef

Sports lens

$1,249

Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Wide maximum Significantly wider aperture
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

Telephoto lens

$1,149

Weight Lighter
Lowest price Cheaper
Aperture Narrower aperture
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 II EX DG APO Macro HSM Canon-ef

Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 II EX DG APO Macro HSM Canon-ef

Sports lens

$799

Lowest price Cheaper
Magnification More magnification
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Wide maximum Significantly wider aperture

Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS USM Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon 400mm f/5.6L USM

Canon 400mm f/5.6L USM

Wildlife lens

$1,219

Max focal length Better telephoto
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Pentax SMC  DA* 300mm f/4 ED SDM

Pentax SMC DA* 300mm f/4 ED SDM

Wildlife lens

$1,397

Length Shorter
Weight Slightly lighter
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 300mm f/4D ED-IF

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 300mm f/4D ED-IF

Wildlife lens

$1,134

Magnification Slightly more magnification
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Weight Slightly heavier

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments