differences

Reasons to consider the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Cheaper $608.69 vs $1,299.00
Help
The best price we've seen is $690 cheaper (2.1x less)
Slightly smaller diameter 84 mm vs 89 mm
Help
Around 10% smaller lens at the end
Slightly shorter 97 mm vs 112 mm
Help
More than 10% shorter
Slightly lighter 475 g vs 0.6 kg
Help
Around 30% lighter
Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM Learn more about
the Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM

Reasons to consider the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM

Wider aperture f/2.8 vs f/4
Help
At its widest, the EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM captures slightly more light (1 f-stop)
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM Learn more about
the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM

similarities

Compared to digital camera lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Fixed aperture Constant aperture lenses Help
The same maximum aperture at all focal lengths
Auto focus Auto focus Help
Easier to use
Prime lens Both are zoom lenses Help
Typically not as sharp as prime lenses
Max focal length Poor telephoto Help
EF 17-40mm f/4L USM40 mm
EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM35 mm

Compared to digital camera lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Wide minimum Wide aperture Help
f/22
Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
Risk of blur

competitors

Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM Competitors

Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 DG HSM II Canon EF

Sigma 12-24mm f/4.5-5.6 DG HSM II Canon EF

Wide angle lens

$650 - $949

Lowest price Cheaper
Diameter Slightly smaller diameter
Wide minimum Much wider aperture
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Wide angle lens

$100 - $999

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Lowest price Cheaper
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM

Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM

Wide angle lens

$738 - $799

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Lowest price Cheaper

Canon EF 17-40mm f/4L USM Competitors

Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM

Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM

Macro lens

$719 - $899

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Magnification More magnification
Weight Slightly heavier
Nikon Nikkor AF-S 17-35mm f/2.8D ED-IF

Nikon Nikkor AF-S 17-35mm f/2.8D ED-IF

Wide angle lens

Aperture Wider aperture
Weight Slightly heavier
Tokina AT-X 16-28mm f/2.8 Pro FX Canon EF

Tokina AT-X 16-28mm f/2.8 Pro FX Canon EF

Wide angle lens

$549 - $679

Aperture Wider aperture
Length Longer

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments