vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Canon EF 135mm f/2.8 Soft Focus

Significantly narrower aperture f/32 vs f/22
Help
At its narrowest, the EF 135mm f/2.8 Soft Focus goes 1.1 f-stops narrower
Better telephoto 135 mm vs 85 mm
Help
Around 60% more reach, less perspective distortion
Canon EF 135mm f/2.8 Soft Focus Learn more about
the Canon EF 135mm f/2.8 Soft Focus

Reasons to consider the Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM

Has a silent focus motor Canon USM vs None
Help
Focuses quickly and silently
Wider aperture f/1.8 vs f/2.8
Help
At its widest, the 85mm f/1.8 USM captures much more light, 1.3 f-stops
Better wide angle 85 mm vs 135 mm
Help
Around 40% better wide angle
Shorter 71 mm vs 99 mm
Help
Around 30% shorter
Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM Learn more about
the Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Prime lens Fixed focal length prime lenses Help
Typically very sharp
Zoom range Poor zoom Help
1x
Magnification Poor magnification Help
EF 135mm f/2.8 Soft Focus:1:8 (0.1x)
85mm f/1.8 USM:1:7 (0.1x)

Compared to portrait lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

LensHero is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
Risk of blur

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro

Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro

Macro lens

$519

Magnification Has better macro
Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Length Is longer
Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM

Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM

Low light lens

$1,899

Aperture Has a wider aperture
Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
Canon EF 100mm f/2 USM

Canon EF 100mm f/2 USM

Low light lens

$449

Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM

Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM

Sports lens

$955

Rokinon 85mm f/1.4 Canon-ef

Rokinon 85mm f/1.4 Canon-ef

Low light lens

$269

Auto focus Lacks autofocus
Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX Macro Canon-ef

Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX Macro Canon-ef

Macro lens

$479

Wide maximum Has a higher max f/stop
Magnification Has better macro
Aperture Has a narrower aperture

Canon EF 135mm f/2.8 Soft Focus Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Nikon Nikkor  50mm f/1.4 AIS

Nikon Nikkor 50mm f/1.4 AIS

Low light lens

$470

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Min focal length Better wide angle
Auto focus Auto focus
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Nikon Nikkor DC 135mm f/2D

Nikon Nikkor DC 135mm f/2D

Sports lens

$1,149

Aperture Wider aperture
Wide maximum Much wider aperture
Weight Heavier
Canon 85mm f/1.8 EF USM

Canon 85mm f/1.8 EF USM

Low light lens

$369

Focus motor Has a silent focus motor
Aperture Wider aperture
Max focal length Worse telephoto

Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II

Low light lens

$92 - $110

Min focal length Better wide angle
Length Shorter
Focus motor Doesn't have a silent focus motor
Max focal length Slightly worse telephoto
Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM

Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM

Sports lens

$894

Aperture Wider aperture
Wide maximum Wider aperture
Lowest price Slightly more expensive
Canon 50mm f/1.4 USM

Canon 50mm f/1.4 USM

Low light lens

$349

Aperture Wider aperture
Min focal length Better wide angle
Max focal length Slightly worse telephoto
Canon EF 35mm f/2

Canon EF 35mm f/2

Low light lens

$289

Min focal length Better wide angle
Magnification More magnification
Focus motor Doesn't have a silent focus motor
Max focal length Worse telephoto
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

Macro lens

$539

Magnification Much more magnification
Image stabilization Image stabilization
Aperture Narrower aperture
Weight Slightly heavier

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments