vs

differences

Reasons to consider the Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM

Has a silent focus motor Canon USM vs None
Help
Focuses quickly and silently
Wider aperture f/1.8 vs f/2.5
Help
At its widest, the 85mm f/1.8 USM captures much more light, 0.9 f-stops
Slightly better telephoto 85 mm vs 50 mm
Help
70% more reach, less perspective distortion
Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM Learn more about
the Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM

Reasons to consider the Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro

Significantly more magnification 1:2 (0.5x) vs 1:7 (0.1x)
Help
Take macro shots with subjects around 3.5x larger in your photo
Significantly narrower aperture f/32 vs f/22
Help
At its narrowest, the 50mm f/2.5 Macro goes 1.1 f-stops narrower
Better wide angle 50 mm vs 85 mm
Help
More than 40% better wide angle
Slightly lighter 277 g vs 422 g
Help
More than 30% lighter
Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro Learn more about
the Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro

similarities

Compared to lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Prime lens Fixed focal length prime lenses Help
Typically very sharp
Aperture Wide aperture Help
85mm f/1.8 USM:f/1.8
50mm f/2.5 Macro:f/2.5
Zoom range Poor zoom Help
1x
Image stabilization No image stabilization Help
Risk of blur

Compared to low light lenses

Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
Auto focus Auto focus Help
Easier to use

LensHero is not aware of any interesting weaknesses shared by these two products.

competitors

Shared Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II

Low light lens

$92

Canon 50mm f/1.4 USM

Canon 50mm f/1.4 USM

Low light lens

$339

Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro

Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro

Macro lens

Magnification Has better macro
Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Length Is longer
Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM

Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM

Macro lens

$485

Magnification Has better macro
Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Canon EF 35mm f/2

Canon EF 35mm f/2

Low light lens

$289

Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Di Macro Canon-ef

Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Di Macro Canon-ef

Macro lens

$498

Magnification Has better macro
Aperture Has a narrower aperture
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

Macro lens

$609

Magnification Has better macro
Image stabilization Has image stabilization
Aperture Has a narrower aperture

Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM

Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM

Sports lens

$969

Aperture Wider aperture
Wide maximum Wider aperture
Magnification Slightly less magnification
Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM

Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM

Sports lens

$1,089

Wide maximum Significantly narrower aperture
Max focal length Better telephoto
Min focal length Worse wide angle
Length Longer

Canon 50mm f/2.5 Macro Competitors

Advantages

Disadvantages

Nikon Nikkor  50mm f/1.8D

Nikon Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D

Low light lens

$109

Aperture Wider aperture
Length Slightly shorter
Magnification Significantly less magnification
Wide maximum Significantly wider aperture

discussion Which do you think is better?

Speech is free, but discussion at LensHero is moderated! Please discuss your opinion of these lenses here, and discuss feedback for LensHero at our support community.

Showing 0 comments